FOR POUCHES TO SUCCEED,
SUSTAINABILITY MUST BE A FRONT-AND-CENTER ISSUE
With a difficult mixture of materials, the pouch industry has consistently grappled with the issue of sustainability and how to meet the onslaught of new imperatives from brand owner and retailer customers.
But sustainability has emerged as a major opportunity for pouch converters, one that many at the Global Pouch Forum said would become “business as usual” and add value to pouches. Besides the pioneering launch of a mono-material pouch by Method Home at the conference (see the separate story in the May 30 issue of
Packaging Strategies Newsletter), other sustainability imperatives are stepping to the front burner among pouch converters and brand owners.
Co-keynoter Charles Murray, president/ceo of PPi Technologies Global, Sarasota, FL, set the tone by stating that total product life cycle costs should be a key focus when working with brand owners and OEM suppliers. In many cases, pouches can meet life cycle needs if they ensure low energy usage during production, focus on reduced storage space and cube utilization, and showcase the idea that one truckload of pouches equates to 25 truckloads of rigid containers.
“There is a lot of work to do getting sustainability down,” Murray emphasized. “But we must continue to show that (solutions) work and are both good for me and for the Earth.”
In a probing discussion on how flexible packaging converters can meet sustainability challenges, Sal Pellingra, innovation and marketing director of Cincinnati-based Ampac Flexibles, said pouch converters must “improve the product recipe” and focus on lightweighting as a key driver.
That quest was put into greater perspective by Manteno, IL-based Zip-Pak, which commissioned a study by Franklin Associates on the lifecycle advantages of reclosable bags compared to bag-in-box applications for cereal and other uses. According to business development manager Bob Stolmeier, the results showed pouches used 85 percent less energy and generated 3.5 times less waste than bags-in-box. However, the study did not detail the materials used to match up packages in each format, a potential failure to provide apples-to-apples cost comparisons.
"There is a lot of work to do getting sustainability down," Charles Murray emphasized. "But we must continue to show that (solutions) work and are both good for me and for the Earth." |
Several members of a Brand Owner & Retailer “Wants, Needs & Desires” Panel Discussion said sustainability could make or break the future of pouches in their operations. “In the past, 99 percent of our efforts went to cost savings,” said Chris Wolpert, principal engineer for innovations and sustainability with Dial Corp., Tempe, AZ. “This year, sustainability is become a big and more holistic project. It’s really driving a lot of our internal efforts.”
Packaging Strategies’ Perspective: The efforts of Ampac, Zip-Pak and others to showcase the sustainability of pouches are admirable, especially if those packages emphasize lightweight and cube utilization. However, many are questioning the use of LCAs as comparative marketing tools, rather than as internal evaluation and process improvement tools, the purpose for which they are actually intended. |